Preview

PULMONOLOGIYA

Advanced search

Virus-induced and bacteria-induced exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease caused by industrial aerosols or tobacco smoke exposure

https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2022-32-2-189-198

Abstract

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are associated with disease progression and increased risk of death. We need to better understand the phenotypes of AECOPD to improve treatment strategies. The main triggers of COPD exacerbations are viral and bacterial infections.

The aim is to characterize the viral, bacterial, and viral-bacterial phenotypes of acute exacerbations in patients with COPD caused by industrial aerosol exposure or tobacco smoke.

Methods. 180 subjects with established moderate and severe COPD who met the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria, 2020 – 2021, and were hospitalized with AECOPD, were enrolled in this prospective observational study. The virus-induced, bacteria-induced, and virus-bacteria-induced AECOPD strata (n = 60 each) were formed. Each stratum included 30 patients with occupational COPD and 30 patients with COPD caused by tobacco smoke. Virus-induced AECOPDs were diagnosed by PCR of bronchoalveolar fluid. Length of hospital stay, symptoms, lung function, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), and type of inflammation were assessed. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to examine the relationships.

Results. The length of hospital stay was highest in patients with virus-induced and virus-bacteria-induced exacerbations of occupational COPD, being equal to (Me, IQR) 16.5 (14 – 18) and 18 (16 – 20) days. The virus-induced exacerbations in occupational COPD and in COPD caused by tobacco smoke featured the highest bronchodilation coefficient, 10.9 (9.8 – 11,5)% and 9.2 (8.3 – 10.3)%, respectively, decrease in the diffusing capacity of the lungs (DLCO/Va) by 42 (40 – 45)% and 49 (47 – 52)%, increase in mPAP by 44 (39 – 45) и 33 (29 – 38) mmHg, and eosinophilic inflammation with blood eosinophil count of 425 (385 –527) and 350 (310 – 391) cells per μl (р > 0.01). Virus-bacteria-induced AECOPD in occupational COPD and in COPD caused by smoke were characterized by decrease in FEV1 by 40.2 (36.6 – 42.2)% and 31.0 (28.1 – 33.6%), decrease in DLCO/Va by 48 (44 – 50)% and 37 (35 – 41)%, increase in mPA by 43 (38 – 46) and 50 (45 – 54) mmHg, and eosinophilic-neutrophilic inflammation in 63.3 and 66.6% of patients. The mid-range FEV1, highest DLCO/Va, and neutrophilic inflammation were seen in patients with bacteria-induced AECOPD.

Conclusion. Exacerbations of occupational COPD are characterized by more severe functional impairment and inflammation with high eosinophil count when these exacerbations have viral origin.

About the Authors

L. A. Shpagina
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Novosibirsk State Medical University”, Healthcare Ministry of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Lyubov A. Shpagina, Doctor of Medicine, Professor, head of the internal medicine and rehabilitation department

Novosibirsk, Krasnyy prosp. 52, 630091, Russiaa



O. S. Kotova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Novosibirsk State Medical University”, Healthcare Ministry of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Olga S. Kotova, Doctor of Medicine, Assistant Professor of the internal medicine and rehabilitation department

Novosibirsk, Krasnyy prosp. 52, 630091, Russiaa



I. S. Shpagin
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Novosibirsk State Medical University”, Healthcare Ministry of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Ilya S. Shpagin, Doctor of Medicine, Assistant Professor of the internal medicine and rehabilitation department

Novosibirsk, Krasnyy prosp. 52, 630091, Russiaa



G. V. Kuznetsova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Novosibirsk State Medical University”, Healthcare Ministry of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Galina V. Kuznetsova, Candidate of Medicine, Assistant of the internal medicine and rehabilitation department

Novosibirsk, Krasnyy prosp. 52, 630091, Russiaa



D. A. Gerasimenko
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Novosibirsk State Medical University”, Healthcare Ministry of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Dmitrij A. Gerasimenko, graduate student of the internal medicine and rehabilitation department

Novosibirsk, Krasnyy prosp. 52, 630091, Russiaa



E. V. Anikina
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Novosibirsk State Medical University”, Healthcare Ministry of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Ekaterina V. Anikina, graduate student of the internal medicine and rehabilitation department

Novosibirsk, Krasnyy prosp. 52, 630091, Russiaa



References

1. Adeloye D., Chua S., Lee C. et al. Global Health Epidemiology Reference Group (GHERG). Global and regional estimates of COPD prevalence: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Glob. Health. 2015; 5 (2): 020415. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.05-020415.

2. Chuchalin A.G., Khaltaev N., Antonov N.S. et al. Chronic respiratory diseases and risk factors in 12 regions of the Russian Federation. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2014; 9: 963–974. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S67283.

3. INME. GBD Compare | Viz Hub. Available at: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ [Assecced: July 13, 2021].

4. Gerayeli FV, Milne S, Cheung C. et al. COPD and the risk of poor outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2021; 33: 100789. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100789.

5. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2021 Report. Available at: https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GOLD-REPORT-2021-v1.1-25Nov20_WMV.pdf [Assessed: July 13, 2021].

6. Aisanov Z.R., Avdeev S.N., Arkhipov V.V. et al. [National clinical guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a clinical decision-making algorithm]. Pul’monologiya. 2017; 27 (1): 13–20. DOI: 10.18093/0869-0189-2017-27-1-13-20 (in Russian).

7. Suissa S., Dell’Aniello S., Ernst P. Long-term natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: severe exacerbations and mortality. Thorax. 2012; 67 (11): 957–963. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201518.

8. Naya I.P., Tombs L., Muellerova H. et al. Long-term outcomes following first short-term clinically important deterioration in COPD. Respir. Res. 2018; 19 (1): 222. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-018-0928-3.

9. Kerkhof M., Voorham J., Dorinsky P. et al. Association between COPD exacerbations and lung function decline during maintenance therapy. Thorax. 2020; 75 (9): 744–753. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214457.

10. Sato M., Chubachi S., Sasaki M. et al. Impact of mild exacerbation on COPD symptoms in a Japanese cohort. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2016; 11: 1269–1278. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S105454.

11. Westerik J.A.M., Metting E.I., van Boven J.F.M. et al. Associations between chronic comorbidity and exacerbation risk in primary care patients with COPD. Respir. Res. 2017; 18 (1): 31. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-017-0512-2.

12. Zykov K.A., Ovcharenko S.I., Avdeev S.N. et al. [Phenotypic characteristics of COPD patients with a smoking history in POPE-study in the Russian Federation]. Pul’monologiya. 2020; 30 (1): 42–52. DOI: 10.18093/0869-0189-2020-30-1-42-52 (in Russian).

13. So A.K., Avdeev S.N., Nuralieva G.S. et al. [Predictors of poor outcomes in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. Pul’monologiya. 2018; 28 (4): 446–452. DOI: 10.18093/0869-0189-2018-28-4-446-452 (in Russian).

14. Luo Z., Zhang W., Chen L., Xu N. Prognostic value of neutrophil: lymphocyte and platelet: Lymphocyte ratios for 28-day mortality of patients with AECOPD. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2021; 14: 2839–2848. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S312045.

15. Crisafulli E., Ielpo A., Barbeta E. et al. Clinical variables predicting the risk of a hospital stay for longer than 7 days in patients with severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective study. Respir. Res. 2018; 19 (1): 261. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-018-0951-4.

16. Brandsma C.A., Van den Berge M., Hackett T.L. et al. Recent advances in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease pathogenesis: from disease mechanisms to precision medicine. J. Pathol. 2020; 250 (5): 624–635. DOI: 10.1002/path.5364.

17. Jones T.P.W., Brown J., Hurst J.R. et al. COPD exacerbation phenotypes in a real-world five year hospitalisation cohort. Respir. Med. 2020; 167: 105979. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105979.

18. Jafarinejad H., Moghoofei M., Mostafaei S. et al. Worldwide prevalence of viral infection in AECOPD patients: a meta-analysis. Microb. Pathog. 2017; 113: 190–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.10.021.

19. Jones P.W., Harding G., Berry P. et al. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. Eur. Respir. J. 2009; 34 (3): 648–654. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00102509.

20. Chuchalin A.G., Aisanov Z.R., Chikina S.Yu. et al. [Federal guidelines of Russian Respiratory Society on spirometry]. Pul’monolo­ giya. 2014; (6): 11–24. DOI: 10.18093/0869-0189-2014-0-6-11-24 (in Russian).

21. Graham B.L., Brusasco V., Burgos F. et al. 2017 ERS/ATS standards for single-breath carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur. Respir. J. 2017; 49 (1): 1600016. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00016-2016.

22. Pavord I.D., Lettis S., Anzueto A., Barnes N. Blood eosinophil count and pneumonia risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Respir. Med. 2016; 4 (9): 731–741. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30148-5.

23. Haldar P., Pavord I.D. Noneosinophilic asthma: a distinct clinical and pathologic phenotype. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007; 119 (5): 1043–1052. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.02.042.

24. Gunasekaran K., Ahmad M., Rehman S. et al. Impact of a positive viral polymerase chain reaction on outcomes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 2020; 17 (21): 8072. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17218072.

25. Wilkinson T.M.A., Hurst J.R., Perera W.R. et al. Eff of interactions between lower airway bacterial and rhinoviral infection in exacerbations of COPD. Chest. 2006; 129 (2): 317–324. DOI: 10.1378/chest.129.2.317.

26. Shpagina L.A., Kotova O.S., Saraskina L.E., Ermakova M.A. et al. [Peculiarities of cellular molecular mechanisms of professional chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. Sibirskoe meditsinskoe obozrenie. 2018; 110 (2): 37–45. DOI: 10.20333/2500136-2018-2-37-45 (in Russian).

27. Fonseca W., Lukacs N.W., Elesela S., Malinczak C.A. Role of ILC2 in viral-induced lung pathogenesis. Front. Immunol. 2021; 12: 675169. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.675169.

28. Wronski S., Beinke S., Obernolte H. et al. Rhinovirus-induced human lung tissue responses mimic COPD and asthma gene signatures. Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2021: 65 (5): 544–554. DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2020-0337OC.

29. Jang J.G., Ahn J.H., Jin H.J. Incidence and prognostic factors of respiratory viral infections in severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2021; 16: 1265–1273. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S306916.


Review

For citations:


Shpagina L.A., Kotova O.S., Shpagin I.S., Kuznetsova G.V., Gerasimenko D.A., Anikina E.V. Virus-induced and bacteria-induced exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease caused by industrial aerosols or tobacco smoke exposure. PULMONOLOGIYA. 2022;32(2):189-198. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2022-32-2-189-198

Views: 490


ISSN 0869-0189 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9617 (Online)