Preview

Пульмонология

Расширенный поиск

Преимущества и недостатки приспособлений для индивидуальной ингаляционной терапии

Полный текст:

Об авторе

А. Н. Цой
Московская медицинская академия им. И.М.Сеченова
Россия


Список литературы

1. Бронхиальная астма Глобальная стратегия. Совместный доклад Национального института сердце, легкие, кровь США и ВОЗ. / / Пульмонология.— 1996.— Приложение.— С.1—154.

2. British Thoracic Society (BTS) and others. Guadlines on the m anagem ent of asthma / / Thorax.— 1993.— Vol.48, Suppl.— P. 1—24.

3. National Institute of Health NIH International Consensus Report on the Diagnosis and M anagem ent of asthm a. Publ. 92-3091 / / Eur. Respir. J.— 1992.— Vol.5.— P.601—641.

4. Ryrfedt A. Pharmacokinetic aspects of drugs for ingalation / / A New Concept in Ingalation Therapy / Eds S.P. Newm an, F. Morem, G.K. Crom pton.— Bussum: Medicom, 1987.— P.49—64.

5. Dauies D.S. Pharmacokinetics of inhaled substances / / Postgrad. med J .— 1975.— Vol.51, Suppl.7.— P.69—75.

6. Newman S.P. Aérosol déposition considération in inhalation the rapy / / Chest.— 1985. Vol.88. Suppl.2.— P.152—160.

7. Цой A.H. Клиническая фармакология ингаляционных глюкокортистероидов / / Пульмонология.— 1996.— № 2.— С.85—90.

8. Woodcock A. Continuing patient care with metered-dose inhalers / / J. Aerosol. M e d .— 1995.— Vol.8. Suppl.2.— P .5 — 10.

9. Boyd G. The continued need for mefered-dose inhalers / / Ibid.— S u p p l.l.— P.9—12.

10. Woodcock A. CFC s and inhales / / Lancet.— 1994.— Vol.3 44.— P.182—183.

11. Cocchetto D.M., Synes R.S., Spector S. Paradoxal bronchospasm after use of inhalation aerosois: a review of the literature / / J. Clin. Asthma.— 1991.— Vol.28.— P.49—53.

12. Jackson W.F. Nebulised Budesonid T herapy in Asthma. A scientific and Practical Review.— Oxford, 1995.— P. 1—64.

13. Hilton S. An audit of inhaler technique am ong patients of 34 general practitioners / / Brit. J. Gen. Pract.— 1990.— Vol.40.— P.505—506.

14. Levison H., Reilly P.A., Worsley G.H. Spacing devices and metered-dose inhalers in chidhood asthma / / Paediatrics.— 1985.— Vol.107.— P.662—668.

15. Keeley D. Large volume plastic spacers in asthm a — shoud be used more / / Br. Med. J.— 1992.— Vol.304.— P.598—599.

16. Lee H., Evans H.E. Evaluation of inhalation aids of metered-dose inhalers in asthmatic children / / Chest.— 1987.— Vol.31. № 3.— P.366—369.

17. Canny G.J., Levison H. Aerosols-therapeutic use and delivery in childhood asthma / / Ann. Allergy.— 1988.— Vol.60.— P. 11 — 19.

18. Harrell F. Choosing inhalers devices for cnildren with asthma / / Paediatr. N urs.— 1993.— Vol.5, № 7.— P.22—24.

19. Fong P.M., Sinclair D.E. Inhalation devices for asthma. Choosing the right one could make the difference / / Can. Fam. Physician.— 1993. - Vol.39.— P.2377—2381.

20. Borgstorm L., Newnan S. Total and regional lung desposition of ierbutaline sulfate inhaled via a pressurised MDI via Turbuhaler / / Methodogicai Studies on Lung Desposition. Evaluation of inhalation Devices and Absorbtion Mechanisms / / Ed. L. Borgstrom .— Uppsala, 1993.— P.36—37.

21. Wetterlin K. Turbuhaler inhaler: a new powder inhalers for administration of drugs to the airways / / Pharmacol. Res.— 1988.— Vol.5.— P.506—508.

22. O’Gorman P.L., Dawson K.P., Mogridge N. Dry powder inhalation devices: consumer perceptions of two new devices / / N.Z. Fam. Physician.— 1990.— Vol.41.— P.182—183.

23. Цой A.H., Семенова Л.Г., Титова Е.В. Вентодиски — новая лекарственная форма сальбутамола / / Российский национальный конгресс “Человек и лекарство ”, I -й: Тезисы.— М.. 1992.— N° 469.

24. Tsoi A., Bulgakov В., Titova Е. The comparison of bronchodilative effects of single doses powder (turbuhaler) and aerosol (inhaler) of terbutaline in patients with reversible airflow obstruction / / Congress of Slovac and Czech. Pneomologic Phtisioiogic Societies with Intern Participa. 8-th: Abstracts.— Martin, 1994.— P. 118.

25. Persson G., Gruvstad E., Stahl E. A new multiple dose powder inhaler, (terbuhaler), compared with a pressurized inhaler in a study of terbutaline in asthmatics / / Eur. Respir. J.— 1988 — Vol.l.— P.681—684.

26. Berg T., Engstrong I., Graff-Lonnevig V. et al. A multi-centre comparison of a new inhalation device, the Diskhaler with Rotahaler in the treatment of childhood asthma / / Annual Meeting of the SEPCR, 23-rd: Proceedings.— Athens, 1988.— P. 156s.

27. Fuller R. The Diskus: A new multi-dose Powder Device-Efficacy and comparison with Turbuhaler / / J. Aerosol Med.— 1995 — £ Vol.8, S uppl.2.— P.11—17.

28. Bisgaard H., Ifversen M.F., Klug B. et al. Inspiratory flow rate through the Diskus inhaler and Turbuhaler inhaler in children with asthm a / / Ibid.— № 8.— P. 100—126.

29. Malton A., Pharm B., Sumby B.S., Smiths I.J. A comparison of in vitro drug delivery from two multidose powder inhalation devices / / Eur. Clin. R es.— 1995.— Vol.7.— P. 177—193.

30. Olsson B., Asking L. Critical aspects of the function of inspiratory flow driven inhalers / / J. Aerosol Med.— 1994.— Vol 7 Suppl.l.— P.43—47.

31. Brindley A., Sumby B.S., Smith I. et al. Desing, manufacture and dose conistency of the Serevent diskus inhaler / / Pharm. Techn Eur.— 1995.— Vol.7. № 1.— P. 14—22.

32. Gunawardena K.A., Clay M.M., Jenkins M.M. The Discus/Accuhaler multidose powder inhaler for the delivery of sahneterol in adult asthm atics / / Br. J. Clin. Res.— 1995.— Vol.6.— P.57—61.

33. Clarke A.R., Hollingworth A.M. The relationship between powder inhaler resistance and peak inspiratory conditions in heathy volunteers-implications for in vitro testin g / / J. Aerosol. Med.— 1993.— Vol.6.— P.99—110.

34. Sparma R.K., Edwards K., Hallet C., Fuller R.W. Perception among paediatric patients of the Diskus inhaler, a novel multidose powder inhaler for use in the treatment of asthma: comparison with the Turbuhaler inhaler / / Clin. Drug. Invest.— 1996.— Vol.l 1, № 3 .— P .145 — 153.

35. Repper J.A. A cross-over study comparing accuracy of patients drug usage records when using salbutamol via diskhaler and terbutaline via the turbuhaler inhaler on an “as required”basis / / Eur. Respir. J.— 1993.— Vol.6, Suppl.17.— P.352.

36. Thomas H.L. An open-label, parallel group, randomised study comparing patiets compliance with regular inhaled corticosteroid therapy taken from either the turbuhaler inhaler (budesonide) / / Ibid.— P.12—27.

37. Schlaeppi М., Edwards K., Fuller R.W. et al. Patient perception fo the D iskus inhaler, a novel multidose powder inhaler for use in the treatment of asthma: comparison with the Turbuh aler inhaler / / Br. J. Clin. Pract.— 1996.— Vol.50.— P .14 — 19.


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Цой А.Н. Преимущества и недостатки приспособлений для индивидуальной ингаляционной терапии. Пульмонология. 1997;(3):71-74.

For citation:


Tsoi A.N. Advantages and disadvantages of appliances for individual inhalation therapy. PULMONOLOGIYA. 1997;(3):71-74. (In Russ.)

Просмотров: 8


ISSN 0869-0189 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9617 (Online)