Preview

Пульмонология

Расширенный поиск

Преимущества и недостатки приспособлений для индивидуальной ингаляционной терапии

Об авторе

А. Н. Цой
Московская медицинская академия им. И.М.Сеченова
Россия


Список литературы

1. Бронхиальная астма Глобальная стратегия. Совместный доклад Национального института сердце, легкие, кровь США и ВОЗ. / / Пульмонология.— 1996.— Приложение.— С.1—154.

2. British Thoracic Society (BTS) and others. Guadlines on the m anagem ent of asthma / / Thorax.— 1993.— Vol.48, Suppl.— P. 1—24.

3. National Institute of Health NIH International Consensus Report on the Diagnosis and M anagem ent of asthm a. Publ. 92-3091 / / Eur. Respir. J.— 1992.— Vol.5.— P.601—641.

4. Ryrfedt A. Pharmacokinetic aspects of drugs for ingalation / / A New Concept in Ingalation Therapy / Eds S.P. Newm an, F. Morem, G.K. Crom pton.— Bussum: Medicom, 1987.— P.49—64.

5. Dauies D.S. Pharmacokinetics of inhaled substances / / Postgrad. med J .— 1975.— Vol.51, Suppl.7.— P.69—75.

6. Newman S.P. Aérosol déposition considération in inhalation the rapy / / Chest.— 1985. Vol.88. Suppl.2.— P.152—160.

7. Цой A.H. Клиническая фармакология ингаляционных глюкокортистероидов / / Пульмонология.— 1996.— № 2.— С.85—90.

8. Woodcock A. Continuing patient care with metered-dose inhalers / / J. Aerosol. M e d .— 1995.— Vol.8. Suppl.2.— P .5 — 10.

9. Boyd G. The continued need for mefered-dose inhalers / / Ibid.— S u p p l.l.— P.9—12.

10. Woodcock A. CFC s and inhales / / Lancet.— 1994.— Vol.3 44.— P.182—183.

11. Cocchetto D.M., Synes R.S., Spector S. Paradoxal bronchospasm after use of inhalation aerosois: a review of the literature / / J. Clin. Asthma.— 1991.— Vol.28.— P.49—53.

12. Jackson W.F. Nebulised Budesonid T herapy in Asthma. A scientific and Practical Review.— Oxford, 1995.— P. 1—64.

13. Hilton S. An audit of inhaler technique am ong patients of 34 general practitioners / / Brit. J. Gen. Pract.— 1990.— Vol.40.— P.505—506.

14. Levison H., Reilly P.A., Worsley G.H. Spacing devices and metered-dose inhalers in chidhood asthma / / Paediatrics.— 1985.— Vol.107.— P.662—668.

15. Keeley D. Large volume plastic spacers in asthm a — shoud be used more / / Br. Med. J.— 1992.— Vol.304.— P.598—599.

16. Lee H., Evans H.E. Evaluation of inhalation aids of metered-dose inhalers in asthmatic children / / Chest.— 1987.— Vol.31. № 3.— P.366—369.

17. Canny G.J., Levison H. Aerosols-therapeutic use and delivery in childhood asthma / / Ann. Allergy.— 1988.— Vol.60.— P. 11 — 19.

18. Harrell F. Choosing inhalers devices for cnildren with asthma / / Paediatr. N urs.— 1993.— Vol.5, № 7.— P.22—24.

19. Fong P.M., Sinclair D.E. Inhalation devices for asthma. Choosing the right one could make the difference / / Can. Fam. Physician.— 1993. - Vol.39.— P.2377—2381.

20. Borgstorm L., Newnan S. Total and regional lung desposition of ierbutaline sulfate inhaled via a pressurised MDI via Turbuhaler / / Methodogicai Studies on Lung Desposition. Evaluation of inhalation Devices and Absorbtion Mechanisms / / Ed. L. Borgstrom .— Uppsala, 1993.— P.36—37.

21. Wetterlin K. Turbuhaler inhaler: a new powder inhalers for administration of drugs to the airways / / Pharmacol. Res.— 1988.— Vol.5.— P.506—508.

22. O’Gorman P.L., Dawson K.P., Mogridge N. Dry powder inhalation devices: consumer perceptions of two new devices / / N.Z. Fam. Physician.— 1990.— Vol.41.— P.182—183.

23. Цой A.H., Семенова Л.Г., Титова Е.В. Вентодиски — новая лекарственная форма сальбутамола / / Российский национальный конгресс “Человек и лекарство ”, I -й: Тезисы.— М.. 1992.— N° 469.

24. Tsoi A., Bulgakov В., Titova Е. The comparison of bronchodilative effects of single doses powder (turbuhaler) and aerosol (inhaler) of terbutaline in patients with reversible airflow obstruction / / Congress of Slovac and Czech. Pneomologic Phtisioiogic Societies with Intern Participa. 8-th: Abstracts.— Martin, 1994.— P. 118.

25. Persson G., Gruvstad E., Stahl E. A new multiple dose powder inhaler, (terbuhaler), compared with a pressurized inhaler in a study of terbutaline in asthmatics / / Eur. Respir. J.— 1988 — Vol.l.— P.681—684.

26. Berg T., Engstrong I., Graff-Lonnevig V. et al. A multi-centre comparison of a new inhalation device, the Diskhaler with Rotahaler in the treatment of childhood asthma / / Annual Meeting of the SEPCR, 23-rd: Proceedings.— Athens, 1988.— P. 156s.

27. Fuller R. The Diskus: A new multi-dose Powder Device-Efficacy and comparison with Turbuhaler / / J. Aerosol Med.— 1995 — £ Vol.8, S uppl.2.— P.11—17.

28. Bisgaard H., Ifversen M.F., Klug B. et al. Inspiratory flow rate through the Diskus inhaler and Turbuhaler inhaler in children with asthm a / / Ibid.— № 8.— P. 100—126.

29. Malton A., Pharm B., Sumby B.S., Smiths I.J. A comparison of in vitro drug delivery from two multidose powder inhalation devices / / Eur. Clin. R es.— 1995.— Vol.7.— P. 177—193.

30. Olsson B., Asking L. Critical aspects of the function of inspiratory flow driven inhalers / / J. Aerosol Med.— 1994.— Vol 7 Suppl.l.— P.43—47.

31. Brindley A., Sumby B.S., Smith I. et al. Desing, manufacture and dose conistency of the Serevent diskus inhaler / / Pharm. Techn Eur.— 1995.— Vol.7. № 1.— P. 14—22.

32. Gunawardena K.A., Clay M.M., Jenkins M.M. The Discus/Accuhaler multidose powder inhaler for the delivery of sahneterol in adult asthm atics / / Br. J. Clin. Res.— 1995.— Vol.6.— P.57—61.

33. Clarke A.R., Hollingworth A.M. The relationship between powder inhaler resistance and peak inspiratory conditions in heathy volunteers-implications for in vitro testin g / / J. Aerosol. Med.— 1993.— Vol.6.— P.99—110.

34. Sparma R.K., Edwards K., Hallet C., Fuller R.W. Perception among paediatric patients of the Diskus inhaler, a novel multidose powder inhaler for use in the treatment of asthma: comparison with the Turbuhaler inhaler / / Clin. Drug. Invest.— 1996.— Vol.l 1, № 3 .— P .145 — 153.

35. Repper J.A. A cross-over study comparing accuracy of patients drug usage records when using salbutamol via diskhaler and terbutaline via the turbuhaler inhaler on an “as required”basis / / Eur. Respir. J.— 1993.— Vol.6, Suppl.17.— P.352.

36. Thomas H.L. An open-label, parallel group, randomised study comparing patiets compliance with regular inhaled corticosteroid therapy taken from either the turbuhaler inhaler (budesonide) / / Ibid.— P.12—27.

37. Schlaeppi М., Edwards K., Fuller R.W. et al. Patient perception fo the D iskus inhaler, a novel multidose powder inhaler for use in the treatment of asthma: comparison with the Turbuh aler inhaler / / Br. J. Clin. Pract.— 1996.— Vol.50.— P .14 — 19.


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Цой А.Н. Преимущества и недостатки приспособлений для индивидуальной ингаляционной терапии. Пульмонология. 1997;(3):71-74.

For citation:


Tsoi A.N. Advantages and disadvantages of appliances for individual inhalation therapy. PULMONOLOGIYA. 1997;(3):71-74. (In Russ.)

Просмотров: 275


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.


ISSN 0869-0189 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9617 (Online)