A non-interventional prospective study of the efficacy and tolerability of Elmucin® (erdosteine) in patients with acute bronchitis in real clinical practice (OPERA)
https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2026-36-5-768-780
Abstract
Acute bronchitis is a common respiratory tract disease, the key pathogenetic mechanism of which is abnormal rheological properties of bronchial secretions. Despite the availability of various mucolytic agents, their comparative effectiveness remains insufficiently studied.
The aim. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Elmutsin® (erdosteine) as part of combination therapy for acute bronchitis in realworld clinical practice.
Methods. The study included 120 outpatients (3 groups of 40 patients each): erdosteine (capsules 300 mg), ambroxol (tablets 30 mg), and acetylcysteine (powder 200 or 600 mg). Demographic and clinical data were collected; efficacy was assessed using patient diaries, the Bronchitis Severity Score (BSS), the Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS), a visual analogue scale (VAS) for cough intensity, and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving clinical improvement by Visit 3 according to patient diary data. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.
Results. By Visit 3, clinical improvement was achieved in the vast majority of patients across all three groups. Despite initially higher disease severity in the erdosteine group compared with the ambroxol group (BSS, VAS, CGIS; p = 0.037, 0.027, and 0.002, respectively), differences between groups were no longer significant by Visit 3. Compared with acetylcysteine, the erdosteine group showed statistically significantly lower scores for BSS (0.88 ± 0.85 vs 1.75 ± 1.35; p < 0.001), BCSS (1.03 ± 0.97 vs 2.00 ± 1.52; p = 0.002), VAS (5.56 ± 5.86 vs 11.75 ± 12.70; p = 0.003), and CGII (1.30 ± 0.46 vs 1.60 ± 0.50; p = 0.013). According to patient diary, symptom regression in the erdosteine group was faster starting from day 4 – 5 of therapy. One adverse reaction (epigastric pain, acetylcysteine group) was recorded; no serious adverse reactions occurred.
Conclusion. Erdosteine holds a leading position among the studied mucolytic agents in the treatment of acute bronchitis. Its multifaceted pleiotropic action on pathogenetic mechanisms of the disease, combined with a favorable safety profile and rapid onset of clinical effect, makes it the drug of choice in patients with acute bronchitis.
Keywords
About the Authors
S. N. AvdeevRussian Federation
Sergey N. Avdeev, Doctor of Medicine, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the National Medical Research Center for Pulmonology; Head of the Department of Pulmonology, N.V.Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine; Chief Pulmonologist of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Director of the National Medical Research Center for Pulmonology
Researcher ID: O9740 2015; Author ID: 608300
ul. Trubetskaya 8, build. 2, Moscow, 119991 tel.: (391) 22013-57
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. V. Budnevsky
Russian Federation
Andrey V. Budnevsky, Doctor of Medicine, Professor, Honored Inventor of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Faculty Therapy
ul. Studencheskaya 10, Voronezh, 394622 tel.: (473) 263-81-30
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
I. V. Demko
Russian Federation
Irina V. Demko, Doctor of Medicine, Professor, Head of the Department of Hospital Therapy and Immunology with Postgraduate Physician Training Course; Head of the Lung and Allergology Center
Researcher ID: O9740 2015; Author ID: 608300
ul. Partizana Zheleznyaka 1, Krasnoyarsk, 660022 tel.: (391) 220-13-57
ul. Partizana Zheleznyaka 3А, Krasnoyarsk, 660022
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
O. V. Fateeva
Russian Federation
Oksana V. Fateeva, Candidate of Medicine, Deputy Chief Physician for Medical Care
ul. Bolnichnaya 7, Borinskoye village, Lipetsk district, Lipetsk region, 398510 tel.: (919) 251-55-39
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
A. Yu. Simion
Russian Federation
Aleksey Yu. Simion, Candidate of Medicine, Associate Professor, Department of Faculty Therapy
ul. Studencheskaya 10, Voronezh, 394622 tel.: (952) 950-67-65
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
V. V. Tsoma
Russian Federation
Vera V. Tsoma, Candidate of Medicine, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Diseases, Institute of Continuing Medical and Pharmaceutical Education; Pulmonologist, Consultative Outpatient Clinic; Chief Consultant Pulmonologist of the Volgograd Region Health Committee
pl. Pavshikh bortsov 1, Volgograd, 400066 tel.: (844) 297-42-53
ul. Angarskaya 13, Volgograd, 400081
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
O. V. Masalkina
Russian Federation
Olga V. Masalkina, Candidate of Medicine, Pulmonologist
ul. KIM 64, Perm, 614107 tel.: (342) 260-41-27
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
D. N. Alpenidze
Russian Federation
Diana N. Alpenidze, Candidate of Medicine, Head of the Endocrinology Department
ul. Simonova 5, block 1, letter A, Saint Petersburg, 194358 tel.: (812) 246-73-10
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Kemmerich B. [Evaluation of the effectiveness and tolerability of the finished combination of dry herbal extracts of thyme and primrose root in adults with acute bronchitis and productive cough]. Russkiy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2009; 17 (19): 1234–1240. Available at: https://www.rmj.ru/articles/bolezni_dykhatelnykh_putey/Ocenka_effektivnosti_i_perenosimosti_gotovoy__kombinacii_suhih_ekstraktov_travy_timyyana_i_kornya__pervocveta_u_vzroslyh_stradayuschih_ostrym_bronhitom__s_produktivnym_kashlem/ (in Russian).
2. Kemmerich B., Eberhardt R., Stammer H. [Efficacy and tolerability of a fluid extract combination of thyme herb and ivy leaves and matched placebo in adults suffering from acute bronchitis with productive cough. A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial]. Russkiy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2008; 16 (20): 1333–1340. Available at: https://www.rmj.ru/archive/referativnyy_zhurnal_5/ (in Russian).
3. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. [Clinical Guidelines: Acute bronchitis]. 2024. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/891_1 (in Russian).
4. Kobyakov I.V. [Acute bronchitis: from understanding etiology to adequate therapy]. Izvestiya Rossiyskoy voyenno-meditsinskoy akademii. 2019; 38 (S1-3): 71–73. Available at: https://www.vmeda.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/chas3.pdf (in Russian).
5. Zaitsev A.A., Filon E.A., Storozheva Y.I. [Acute bronchitis – modern possibilities of mucactive therapy] Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2023; 95 (11): 943–950. DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2023.11.202470 (in Russian).
6. Karnaushkina MA. [Clinical aspects of the use of erdosteine in respiratory diseases]. Meditsinskiy sovet. 2023; 17 (4): 132–140. DOI: 10.21518/ms2023-062 (in Russian).
7. Lapidus N.I. [Role of mucoactive therapy in the treatment of acute bronchitis]. Meditsinskiy sovet. 2023; 17 (20): 156–162. DOI: 10.21518/ms2023-402 (in Russian).
8. Chuchalin A.G., Berman B., Lemakher V. [Treatment of acute bronchitis in adults with extract of Pelargonium Sidoides: a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled]. Pul′monologiya. 2007; (6): 49–55. DOI: 10.18093/0869-0189-2007-0-6-49-55 (in Russian).
9. Matthys H., Kamin W. Positioning of the Bronchitis Severity Score (BSS) for standardised use in clinical studies. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2013; 29 (10): 1383–1390. DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2013.832183.
10. Albrecht U., Stefenelli U., Stange R. A combination of Tropaeolum majus herb and Armoracia rusticana root for the treatment of acute bronchitis. Phytomedicine. 2023; 116: 154838. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154838.
11. Park M.J., Rhee C.K., Kim Y.H., et al. Efficacy and safety of HL301 in the treatment of acute bronchitis and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2017; 33 (5): 919–925. DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1295030.
12. Han K.I., Kim T.H., Ra S.W. et al. Efficacy and safety of mixture of ivy leaf extract and coptidis rhizome in the treatment of acute bronchitis: multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, parallel, therapeutic confirmatory clinical trial. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2024; 40 (7): 1235–1243. DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2362273.
13. Yoon S.W., Park M.J., Rhee C.K., et al. HL301 in the treatment of acute bronchitis: a phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2020; 35 (1): 133–141. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2018.181.
14. Orlova N.V. [An integrated approach to the treatment of acute productive cough]. Meditsinskiy sovet. 2025; 19 (20): 166–173. DOI: 10.21518/ms2025-500 (in Russian).
15. Moretti M. Pharmacology and clinical efficacy of erdosteine in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2007; 1 (3): 307–316. DOI: 10.1586/17476348.1.3.307.
16. Braga P.C., Dal Sasso M., Sala M.T., Gianelle V. Effects of erdosteine and its metabolites on bacterial adhesiveness. Arzneimittelforsch. 1999; 49 (4): 344–350. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1300425.
17. Avdeyev S.N. [Perspectives of novel mucoactive drugs in therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. Pul′monologiya. 2014; (2): 100–108. DOI: 10.18093/0869-0189-2014-0-2-100-108 (in Russian).
18. Ofek I., Doyle R.J. Bacterial adhesion to cells and tissues. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1994. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-6435-1.
19. Dal Negro R.W., Visconti M., Micheletto C., Tognella S. Changes in blood ROS, e-NO, and some pro-inflammatory mediators in bronchial secretions following erdosteine or placebo: a controlled study in current smokers with mild COPD. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008; 21 (2): 304–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2007.07.004.
20. Budnevsky A.V., Avdeev S.N., Ovsyannikov E.S. et al. [Acute bronchitis: A modern view at diagnosis and treatment]. Terapiya. 2025; 11 (4): 106–114. DOI: 10.18565/therapy.2025.4.106-114 (in Russian).
21. Barnes PJ. Oxidative stress in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11 (5): 965. DOI: 10.3390/antiox11050965.
22. Miyake K., Kaise T., Hosoe H. et al. The effect of erdosteine and its active metabolite on reactive oxygen species production by inflammatory cells. Inflam. Res. 1999; 48 (4): 205–209. DOI: 10.1007/s000110050447.
23. Manchini C., Nicola M., Lumachi B. Erdosteine effects on serum malondialdehyde of healthy smokers and non-smokers. A pilot study. Eur. Respir. J. 1997; 10 (Suppl. 25): 95s. Available at: https://eurekamag.com/research/031/281/031281430.php?srsltid=AU7gw4VD8WGZ9-gX8JSBFwtJqe3BfdaVhAsoMBPXg_BXXVms2axewitD
24. Savu S., Mitrea M., Silvestro L., Mancini C. HPLC with on-line mass spectrometry detection application to elucidate erdosteine metabolism: preliminary study. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2000; 38 (8): 415–417. DOI: 10.5414/cpp38415.
25. Budnevskiy A.V., Pertsev A.V., Ovsyannikov E.S. [Treatment and prevention of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with erdosteine]. Pul′monologiya. 2015; 25 (3): 373–377. DOI: 10.18093/0869-0189-2015-25-3-373-377 (in Russian).
26. Moon J.Y., Choi J.Y., Kim Y. et al. Efficacy and safety of HL-301 compared with erdosteine in acute bronchitis: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2025; 40 (5): 790–800. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2024.314.
Review
For citations:
Avdeev S.N., Budnevsky A.V., Demko I.V., Fateeva O.V., Simion A.Yu., Tsoma V.V., Masalkina O.V., Alpenidze D.N. A non-interventional prospective study of the efficacy and tolerability of Elmucin® (erdosteine) in patients with acute bronchitis in real clinical practice (OPERA). PULMONOLOGIYA. 2026;36(5):768-780. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2026-36-5-768-780
JATS XML


































