Long-term experience of azithromycin use in patients with asthma and bronchiectasis
https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2026-36-5-810-820
Abstract
The combination of asthma and bronchiectasis is associated with more severe disease, chronic sputum production, and frequent infectious exacerbations.
Aim. To evaluate the effect of longterm azithromycin therapy on clinical manifestations and laboratory markers of inflammation in patients with severe asthma and concomitant bronchiectasis experiencing frequent infective exacerbations.
Methods. The study included 60 adult patients with severe asthma and bronchiectasis. Patients were divided into two groups: the control group received standard asthma therapy; the main group received standard therapy combined with azithromycin at a dose of 500 mg two times a week for 6 months. All patients also received Nacetylcysteine at a dose of 600 mg/day. Symptoms, exacerbation frequency, pulmonary function tests, and laboratory inflammatory markers in blood and sputum were assessed before treatment and after 6 months.
Results. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. After 6 months, the azithromycin group, compared to the control group, showed less severe dyspnea on the mMRC (modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale – mMRC) scale – 2.0 (1.0 – 2.0) vs 3.0 (2.0 – 3.0), p = 0.003; higher asthma control according to ACT (Asthma Control Test) – 21.0 (18.0 – 21.0) vs 16.5 (15.0 – 17.0), p < 0.001; and a lower exacerbation rate over 6 months – 1.0 (0.0 – 2.0) vs 2.0 (1.0 – 2.0), p = 0.001. Reduced laboratory markers of inflammation were also observed: blood leukocytes (p = 0.012), neutrophils (p = 0.004), C reactive protein (p = 0.006), sputum leukocytes (p = 0.010), and the degree of sputum purulence – 1.0 (1.0 – 2.0) vs 3.0 (1.3 – 3.0), p = 0.007. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was higher in the azithromycin group – 1.5 (1.1 – 1.7) L vs 1.1 (0.9 – 1.5) L, p = 0.021.
Conclusion. Longterm azithromycin therapy in patients with severe asthma combined with bronchiectasis was associated with improved asthma control, reduced symptom severity, decreased exacerbation frequency, increased FEV1, and reduced sputum purulence.
About the Authors
I. N. PanarinaRussian Federation
Irina N. Panarina, Pulmonologist
proyezd Shokal’skogo 8, Moscow, 127642 tel.: (499) 479-95-39
Competing Interests:
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors
V. V. Gainitdinova
Russian Federation
Viliya V. Gaynitdinova, Doctor of Medicine, Professor of Pulmonology Department, N.V.Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine
ul. Trubetskaya 8, build. 2, Moscow, 119991 tel.: (495) 708-3576
Competing Interests:
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors
References
1. Ma D., Cruz M.J., Ojanguren I. et al. Risk factors for the development of bronchiectasis in patients with asthma. Sci. Rep. 2021; 11 (1): 22820. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02332-w.
2. Zhang S.Q., Xiong X.F., Wu Z.H. et al. Clinical features of asthma with comorbid bronchiectasis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100 (4): e23858. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023858.
3. Polverino E., Dimakou K., Traversi L. et al. Bronchiectasis and asthma: data from the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC). J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2024; 153 (6): 1553–1562. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.01.027.
4. Chalmers J.D., Elborn S., Greene C.M. Basic, translational and clinical aspects of bronchiectasis in adults. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2023; 32 (168): 230015. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0015-2023.
5. Fouka E., Lindén A., Bossios A. The role of T-helper and T regulatory cells in driving neutrophilic and eosinophilic inflammation in bronchiectasis. Front. Immunol. 2025; 16: 1598257. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1598257.
6. O’Donnell A.E. Bronchiectasis – a clinical review. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022; 387 (6): 533–545. DOI: 10.1056/nejmra2202819.
7. Hill A.T. Defanging the neutrophil to treat bronchiectasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2025; 392 (16): 1649–1652. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe2500787.
8. Wong E.H.C., Porter J.D., Edwards M.R. et al. The role of macrolides in asthma: current evidence and future directions. Lancet Respir. Med. 2014; 2 (8): 657–670. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70107-9.
9. Porsbjerg C., Melén E., Lehtimäki L., Shaw D. Asthma. Lancet. 2023; 401 (10379): 858–873. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02125-0.
10. Keir H.R., Shoemark A., Dicker A.J. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps, disease severity, and antibiotic response in bronchiectasis: an international, observational, multicohort study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2021; 9 (8): 873–884. DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30504-x.
11. Niessen N.M., Gibson P.G., Baines K.J. et al. Sputum TNF markers are increased in neutrophilic and severe asthma and are reduced by azithromycin treatment. Allergy. 2021; 76 (7): 2090–2101. DOI: 10.1111/all.14768.
12. Wong C., Jayaram L., Karalus N. et al. Azithromycin for prevention of exacerbations in non-cystic fi brosis bronchiectasis (EMBRACE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; 380 (9842): 660–667. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60953-2.
13. Altenburg J., de Graaff C.S., Stienstra Y. et al. Effect of azithromycin maintenance treatment on infectious exacerbations among patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: the BAT randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2013; 309 (12): 1251–1259. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.1937.
14. Barker A.F., Karamooz E. Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in adults: a review. JAMA. 2025; 334 (3): 253–264. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2025.2680.
15. Milačić N., Milačić B., Dunjić O. et al. Validity of CAT and mMRC – dyspnea score in evaluation of COPD severity. Acta Med. Med. 2015; 54 (1): 66–70. DOI: 10.5633/amm.2015.0111.
16. Schatz M., Sorkness C.A., Li J.T. et al. Asthma control test: reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients not previously followed by asthma specialists. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006; 117 (3): 549–556. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.01.011
17. McCarroll M., Pohle-Krauza R., Volsko T. et al. Use of the Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale (BCSS) in pulmonary rehabilitation. Open Respir. Med. J. 2013; 7: 1–5. DOI: 10.2174/1874306401307010001.
18. Aliberti S., Ringshausen F.C., Dhar R. et al. Objective sputum colour assessment and clinical outcomes in bronchiectasis: data from the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC). Eur. Respir. J. 2024; 63 (4): 2301554. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01554-2023.
19. Reiff D.B., Wells A.U., Carr D.H. et al. CT findings in bronchiectasis: limited value in distinguishing between idiopathic and specific types. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1995; 165 (2): 261–267. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618537.
20. Gibson P.G., Yang I.A., Upham J.W. et al. Effect of azithromycin on asthma exacerbations and quality of life in adults with persistent uncontrolled asthma (AMAZES): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017; 390 (10095): 659–668. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31281-3.
21. Kelly C., Chalmers J.D., Crossingham I. et al. Macrolide antibiotics for bronchiectasis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018; 3 (3): CD012406. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012406.pub2.
22. Undela K., Goldsmith L., Kew K.M. et al. Macrolides versus placebo for chronic asthma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021; 11 (11): CD002997. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002997.pub5.
23. Pollock J., Chalmers J.D. The immunomodulatory effects of macrolide antibiotics in respiratory disease. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021; 71: 102095. DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2021.102095.
24. Cheng Y.J., Nie X.Y., Chen X.M. et al. The role of macrolide antibiotics in increasing cardiovascular risk. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015; 66 (20): 2173–2184. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.029.
Review
For citations:
Panarina I.N., Gainitdinova V.V. Long-term experience of azithromycin use in patients with asthma and bronchiectasis. PULMONOLOGIYA. 2026;36(5):810-820. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18093/0869-0189-2026-36-5-810-820
JATS XML


































