Ответ на письмо читателя руководителя направления искусственного интеллекта компании «ГЭОТАР­Цифра», руководителя проекта «Консультант врача» Игоря Маратовича Еникеева

1. Goddard K., Roudsari A., Wyatt J.C. Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators. JAMIA. 2012; 19 (1): 121–127. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000089.

2. Bernstein M.H., Atalay M.K., Dibble E.H. et al. Can incorrect artificial intelligence (AI) results impact radiologists, and if so, what can we do about it? A multi-reader pilot study of lung cancer detection with chest radiography. Eur. Radiol. 2023; 33 (11): 8263–8269. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09747-1.

3. Prinster D., Mahmood A., Saria S. et al. Care to explain? AI explanation types differentially impact chest radiograph diagnostic performance and physician trust in AI. Radiology. 2024; 313 (2): e233261. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.233261.

4. Budzyń K., Romańczyk M., Kitala D. et al. Endoscopist deskilling risk after exposure to artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: a multicentre, observational study. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2025; 10 (10): 896–903. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00133-5.

5. World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200

6. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence act). OJEU. 2024; L 2024/1689: Art. 14. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj